EVIDENCE • THE AI REALITY GAP
95% of AI programmes fail.
Yours doesn't have to.
Enterprise AI is failing at scale — not because the technology doesn't work, but because most organisations approach it wrong. Here's what the research says, and what we do differently.
Flagship result: £513k invested · £1.8M–£3M in-year returns · 3.5×–6× ROI
01 — THE EVIDENCE
Three numbers, one pattern.
Enterprise AI fails at predictable, structural points — not technical ones.
-
95% of GenAI pilots fail to show measurable financial returns within six months. (MIT, The GenAI Divide, 2025)
-
Only 5% of companies achieve AI value at scale; 60% generate no material value at all. (BCG, The Widening AI Value Gap, 2025)
-
42% of companies abandoned at least one AI initiative in 2025, up from 17% in 2024. (S&P Global, 2025)
02–07 — WHERE IT BREAKS
What fails — and what we do instead.
-
Pilots prove pilots, not returns. Generic tools stall in enterprise workflows. TIP runs no pilots — every PERSONAL session is 2 hours of hands-on work on a leader's real priorities, producing evidence from day one.
-
73% of failed AI projects lack executive alignment. CEO-led projects succeed 68% of the time vs. 11% without sustained sponsorship. (McKinsey, 2025) TIP starts with the CEO's own PERSONAL session, then a STRATEGIC session to align the top team.
-
AI success is 10% algorithms, 20% data, 70% people — yet most budgets fund the easy 30%. (BCG's 10-20-70 framing) TIP's method targets the 70% first: leadership mindset and behaviour, not tools.
-
61% treat AI as an IT project. Individual productivity gains don't compound without structural redesign. TIP moves from individual fluency to function-level redesign to enterprise orchestration.
-
30% of GenAI projects are abandoned after proof of concept, as consultant-led engagements create dependency. (Gartner, 2025) TIP trains internal facilitators through COACH to self-deliver — the goal is an organisation that no longer needs us.
08 — THE COST OF WAITING
Every quarter you delay, the gap widens.
-
3.6× greater three-year shareholder returns for AI leaders vs. laggards. (BCG, 2025)
-
AI agents projected to be 29% of total AI value by 2028, up from ~17% today. (BCG, 2025)
-
~20% of leadership capacity reclaimed in a TIP cohort — 5 days of decisions made in 4.
-
3.5×–6× ROI evidenced in a flagship enterprise programme, verifiable on request.
